IMPLEMENTASI PENGELOLAAN PROGRAM SHIMIN CENTER DI JEPANG DAN PUSAT KEGIATAN BELAJAR MASYARAKAT (PKBM ) DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Mustofa Kamil Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dadang Yunus Lutfiansyach Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ace Suryadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Elih Sudiapermana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/comm-edu.v6i1.12694

Keywords:

Keywords, Management, Shimin Center, Community Learning Center

Abstract

This study examines the governance of Community Learning Centers (CLC) in 2 countries, namely the Shimin Center in Japan and PKBM in Indonesia. This study explores governance that includes program implementation in managerial aspects, namely the planning, implementation and evaluation functions carried out by Community Learning Centers in Indonesia and Japan. The theory underlying this research is the concept of lifelong education, the concept of community-based education and the concept of community education. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The data collection technique used in this research is through Focus Group Discussion (FGD), interview, observation, literature study and documentation study. The research subjects were 6 people, where 3 people from Shimin Center and 3 people from PKBM. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the community learning center program both in Japan and in Indonesia in terms of aspects; a) program planning is always based on needs, formulation of objectives, program design, recruitment of facilitators and socialization and always refers to government policies; b) Implementation of programs developed by PKBM in Indonesia through a) Program Inputs (raw input, instrumental input, environmental input, process, output, other input and impact). As for the Shimin Center institution in Japan, it adheres to 3 main characteristics, namely the information center, a center for participation and self-actualization and is open to all ages and circles and is a place that guarantees freedom and equal rights, free services, has autonomy as a learning and cultural institution, has staff, is affordable (accessibility), adequate facilities and community participation; c) Evaluation of programs carried out by the Shimin Center in Japan and PKBM in Indonesia is carried out through evaluation of learning (formative and summative), evaluation of program services, personnel, and evaluation of educational unit institutions through unit quality assurance (accreditation). The evaluation carried out by the Japanese Government in managing the Shimin Center includes evaluation of learning carried out by volunteers/facilitators, in addition, evaluation is also carried out by asking for opinions from the community and community leaders.

 

Author Biography

Mustofa Kamil, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Community Education

References

Cropley, A.J., (1978), Lifelong Education: a Psychological Analysis, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.(2012).Standard dan Prosedur Penyelenggaraan PKBM. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Masyarakat.dan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Nonformal dan Informal.

Lutfiansyach, Dadang, Hufad, Purnomo, (2017). The Conceptual Model of Community Learning Center (PKBM) in Indonesia and Community Learning Center (Kominkan) in Japan, International Journal of enggineering and Technology, Vol 7 (330) (2018) (246-250).

W.J.S. Poerwadarminta, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1996), h. 221

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.(2012).Standard dan Prosedur Penyelenggaraan PKBM. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Masyarakat.dan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Nonformal dan Informal.

Purnomo, “Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Keaksaraan Tingkat Lanjutan melalui Vokasional Skill Menjahit di PKBM Ash-Shoddiq Desa Pagerwangi Kecamatan Lembang Kabupaten Bandung,†e-journal.upi.edu, Vol 5, No 2, 2010.

Lutfiansyach, D “Pendidikan Kecakapan Hidup (Life Skills) Dalam Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga (Pekka) Untuk Peningkatan Pendapatan Dan Kemandirian Berwirausaha,†e-journal.upi.edu, vol. 4. No 2, 2009.

Rosmanida, dkk. (2016). Teori kepribadian humanistik Abraham Maslow. Makalah DPPB FIP UPI.

Moleong & Lexy J (1998), Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : CV Remaja Rosdakarya

Kindervatter, S. (1979). Nonformal Education as an Empowering Process. Massachusetts Center for Internasionl Education University of Massachusetts

Ife, Jim. (2008). Community Developmet, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudjana, D. (2004). Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, Wawasan, Sejarah Perkembangan, Falsafah, Teori Pendukung, Azas. Bandung : Falah Production.

Kamil, Mustofa (2012). Pendidikan Non Formal : Belajar dari Jepang (Kominkan)Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat. Bandung : Alfabeta.

George R Terry, (2012) Prinsip-Prinsip Manajemen, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, h. 15

Jensen M & Esterhuysen A (2001), The community telecentre cook book for Africa. Paris.

Rahman SM (2005), Community Learning Center The Bangladesh Experience. Dhaka: Binimoy Printers.

Oana Moldovan & Victor Bocos-Bintintan (2015), The Necessity of reconsidering the Concept of Nonformal Education. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences 209 (2015) 337-343.

UNESCO (2000), Belajar Untuk Hidup Bersama Dalam Damai Dan Harmoni. Kantor Prinsipal UNESCO Kawasan Asia Pasifik.

Indah Purwanti & Indah Widiastuti (2015), Creative empowerment in Non-formal education Institution. Case study;Education System in Rumah Musik Harry Roesly (RMHR). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 184 (2015) 63 – 70.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-16