IDENTIFIKASI HAMBATAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA KONSEP PERSAMAAN KUADRAT

Authors

  • Redo Martila Ruli Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.p%25p

Keywords:

Learning Obstacle, Learning Trajectory, Quadratic Equation

Abstract

This research aims to identify learning obstacles and factors that cause learning obstacles experienced by students in learning the concept of quadratic equations. This research used a qualitative approach with the triangulation method, the subjects in this study were 23 class X students who had studied the concept of quadratic equations. The data collection technique in this research was to give a test in the form of a description question consisting of 2 questions to 23 students. Furthermore,  the researchers analyzed each student's answer and then interviewed 3 students who are considered to be able to represent other students in this research to look more deeply into the learning obstacles that students have on the concept of quadratic equations As well as conducting tests and interviews, the researchers made observations when students passed tests. The learning obstacles that the researcher found in the concept of quadratic equation were categorized into ontogenic obstacle, didactic obstacle, and epistemology obstacle. As a final result, the researchers realized: 1) students did not (fully) understand what a quadratic equation meant; 2) students met challenging to represent the problem in algebraic form; 3) students were able to overcome quadratic equations (test) in single way.

Author Biography

Redo Martila Ruli, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

References

Bossé, M. J., & Nandakumar, N. R. (2005). The factorability of quadratics: Motivation for more techniques. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 24(4), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrh018

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. In Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2

Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034843

Didis, M. Gozde; Bas, Sinem; Erbas, A. K. (2011). Students’ Reasoning in Quadratic Equations with One Unknown. The Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(24), 11.

Didis, M. G., & Erbas, A. K. (2015). Performance and difficulties of students in formulating and solving quadratic equations with one unknown. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(4), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.4.2743

French, D. (2002). Teaching and learning algebra. In Teaching Secondary School Mathematics (pp. 199–226). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117810-11

Kotsopoulos, D. (2007). Unravelling Student Challenges with Quadratics: A Cognitive Approach. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(2), 19–24.

Maudy, S. Y., Suryadi, D., & Mulyana, E. (2017). Contextualizing symbol, symbolizing context. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995156

Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan Filosofis: Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR).

Wheeler, D. (1996). Backwards and forwards: Reflections on different approaches to algebra. In Approaches to algebra (pp. 317-325). Springer, Dordrecht.

Zakaria, E., --, I., & Maat, S. M. (2010). Analysis of Students’ Error in Learning of Quadratic Equations. International Education Studies, 3(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n3p105

Downloads

Published

2021-07-25

Issue

Section

Articles