DIGITAL NATIVE’S VOICES ON ONLINE PLATFORM IN BLENDED LEARNING

Authors

  • Masyhud Masyhud University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Laela Hikmah Nurbatra University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Abstract

Teachers are required to provide digital learning environment which is fit with digital native learners. Moreover, Digital environment offer various online platforms which can be accessed by digital native learners. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the digital native’s voices on online platforms in blended learning.   In regard with the concern, the current research applied a survey research which involves a hundred and fifty two students of English Language Education Department at one of Universities in East Java. In case of instrument, researchers used survey in form of online questionnaire with close-ended questions and rating scales to collect the data. Survey relies on closed-ended questions often use ratings scales. In addition, this research confirmed that the students they cannot decide their position on the function of blended learning along their learning process, 47,4% respondents answered “Maybe”. They also preferred to use Googleclassroom as their learning platform than other platforms. Moreover, Interaction between teacher and students is the main concern in blended learning with 69,6% respondents.

References

Agung, A. S. N., & Surtikanti, M. W. (2020). Students’ perception of online learning during covid-19 pandemic: a case study on the english students of stkip pamane talino. Soshum : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1316

Ashour, S. (2020). How technology has shaped university students’ perceptions and expectations around higher education: an exploratory study of the United Arab Emirates. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2513–2525. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1617683

Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Lassete, A. (2012). Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. In Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/publication/understanding-the-implications-of-online-learning-for-educational-productivity/

Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: an examination of the millennial learner. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674683

Fraccascia, L. (2020). Quantifying the direct network effect for online platforms supporting industrial symbiosis: an agent-based simulation study. Ecological Economics, 170(December 2019), 106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106587

Gallardo-Echenique, E. E., Marqués-Molías, L., Bullen, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2015). Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 156–187. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2196

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003

Halter, N. (2020). Teaching and technology at the university of the south pacific. Journal of Pacific History, 55(4), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223344.2020.1808451

He, W., & Zhao, L. (2020). Exploring undergraduates’ learning engagement via BYOD in the blended learning classroom (EULEBYODBLC). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1356

Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001

Hrastinski, S. (2020). Informed design for learning with digital technologies. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815221

Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2013). From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.12.003

Kanika, & Kaur, H. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning for teaching cardiac disorders on nursing students’ learning outcomes and attitude. International Journal of Scientific Research, 9(1), 16–17. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.36106/ijsr

Klassen, A. C., Creswell, J., Plano, V. L., Clegg, K., & Helen, S. (2012). Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0122-x

Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35(May 2020), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012

Lin, C.-Y., Huang, C.-K., & Ko, C.-J. (2020). The impact of perceived enjoyment on team effectiveness and individual learning in a blended learning business course: The mediating effect of knowledge sharing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4446

Meeter, M., Den Hartogh, C. F., Bakker, T., De Vires, R. E., & Plak, S. (2020). College students ’ motivation and study results after COVID-19 stay-at- home orders. PsyArXiv, 1–26.

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning : A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.011

Mutiara Ayu. (2020). Online learning: leading e-learning at higher education. The Journal of English Literacy and Education, 7(1), 47–54.

Ooi, K. B., Hew, J. J., & Lee, V. H. (2018). Could the mobile and social perspectives of mobile social learning platforms motivate learners to learn continuously? Computers and Education, 120, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.017

Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C. K., & Hanson, D. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on learning - the perspective of the Ghanaian students. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(3), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3753586

Pham, H. H., & Ho, T. T. H. (2020). Toward a ‘new normal’ with e-learning in Vietnamese higher education during the post COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(7), 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1823945

Picciano, A. (2002). Picciano (2002).pdf. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.

Prensky, M. (2009). H . Sapiens Digital : From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom Digital Wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3).

Surani, D., & Hamidah, H. (2020). Students perceptions in online class learning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 3(3), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v3i3.78

Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817761

Thulin, E., & Vilhelmson, B. (2019). More at home, more alone? Youth, digital media and the everyday use of time and space. Geoforum, 100(January), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.010

Vijaya Lakshmi, D., & Sri Lakshmi, M. (2020). Integrated technological tools for effective blended learning. 2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference, IBSSC 2020, 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC51096.2020.9332223

Wang, H. Y., Sigerson, L., & Cheng, C. (2019). Digital nativity and information technology addiction: age cohort versus individual difference approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.031

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics , pedagogies and practices : digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. 9884(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

Yawson, D., & Yamoah, F. A. (2020). Understanding utility essentials of e-learning management systems in higher education: a multi-generational cohort perspective. Open Learning, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1858778

Yusuf, B. N., & Ahmad, J. (2020). Are we prepared enough? a case study of challenges in online learning in a private higher learning institution during the covid-19 outbreaks. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(5), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.75.8211

Downloads

Published

2023-11-09