THE FEATURES OF A NOVICE TEACHER TALK IN CLASSROOM INTERACTION: AN ANALYSIS USING SETT FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Risna Saswati Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing (STBA) LIA, Indonesia
  • Soraya Soraya Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing (STBA) LIA, Indonesia

Abstract

This study sheds light on the features of the SETT framework employed by a novice teacher in order to facilitate learning opportunities. The method applied is descriptive qualitative methods using classroom observation, classroom recording, and field notes as data collection techniques. The SETT framework is chosen to find out the dominant features employed by a novice teacher while interacting with learners in the classroom. The results are all modes in the SETT framework applied by the novice teacher with the IRF interactional pattern as the dominant interaction pattern in classroom interaction. Additionally, the type of display questions is found out in interaction in which it is used to elicit the learners’ responses. The result of this study is the SETT framework is not applicable to be used to evaluate novice teachers since the dominant activities in the classroom are not to reach communicative activities due to his/her teaching experiences. However, the deviant modes are found: shifting and divergent modes. The divergent modes found in this study do not facilitate learning opportunities for learners to have communicative interaction.

Author Biographies

Risna Saswati, Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing (STBA) LIA, Indonesia

She is a lecturer at STBA LIA in Jakarta. Her interest is Aoplied Linguistics. 

 

Soraya Soraya, Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing (STBA) LIA, Indonesia

At present, she is a fulltime lecturer at STBA LIA in Jakarta. Her interests are Linguistics and Applied Linguistics.

References

Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal 52: 179-187.

Diaz, Noemi R. (2009). A Comparative study of native and non-native teachers’ scaffolding techniques in SLA at an early age. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense. 17(2), 57-73.

Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hall, J. Kelly. (2009). Interaction as method and result of language learning. Language Teaching 43(2), 202-215.

Huang, Fang and Li Wang. (2011). A Self-Evaluation of classroom language used when teaching Grammar. International Education Studies 4(1), 1-4.

Llinares-Garcia, Ana. (2005)

Mackey, Alison. (2012). Input, Interaction and Corrective Feedback in L2 Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mesthrie, R. (2008). Sociolinguistics and sociology of language, in Spolsky, B. and Francis M. Hult (eds.). The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Blackwell: USA.

Saswati, Risna. (2018). Analysis of classroom interaction using IRF pattern: A case study of EFL conversation class. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 29-37.

Seedhouse, P. (2011( 2011). Introduction: Conversational Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Novitas-ROYAL 5 (2), 1-14.

Soraya, M. (2017, October). Classroom interactional competence of English classes in higher education. In International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017) (pp. 135-145). Atlantis Press.

Villages-Reimers, Eleonora. (2003). Teacher Professional Development. Paris: UNESCO.

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating Classroom Discourse. USA: Routhledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26