MOVE STRUCTURE IN NONENGINEERING FINAL PROJECT BACKGROUND

Authors

  • Mohammad Febryanto Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Mulyati Khorina Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Iis Sulyaningsih Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Wastu Kurning Purbandini Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

The scientific paper of the final project (TA) of Polban students, especially at the Undergraduate level, has the potential to be published both nationally and internationally. Therefore students must pay attention to the rules in writing scientific work. One rule is to write the background in the introductory chapter. The chapter is a way for the readers to see the contents of the research report. This study aims to investigate the Move and Step in the final project of undergraduate students in nonengineering which are analyzed using the Create a Research Space (CARS) model from Swales and Feak (1994). Qualitative is used because it analyzes the background of the research paper. The researcher investigates phenomenon from the perspective of the participants. There were 173 student final project that were analyzed. Student final project were from non-engineering study programs written in 2022. The result shows that every final project applied Move 1 and Move 3, but slightly Move 2. The Steps in Move 1 were dominated by Step 2 dan Step 3. The Steps used in Move 2 were Step 2 and Step 4, meanwhile in Move 3, Step 1A was found in all the background.

Author Biography

Mohammad Febryanto, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia

I am one of English lecturer at Politeknik Negeri Bandung. My research interest is in  Linguistics, Applied Linguistics,  Systemic Functional Linguistics, Translation, English Language Teaching.

References

Alsharif, M. (2023). Rhetorical Move Structure In Business Management Research Article Introductions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(4).

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Cet. Ke-12. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.

Bajwa, N. ul H., König, C. J., & Kunze, T. (2020). Evidence-based understanding of introductions of research articles. Scientometrics, 124, 195–217.

Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.

Emilia, E. (2009). Menulis tesis dan disertasi. Alfabeta.

Febryanto, M. (2020). Analysis of Structure of Background of Students’final Project. Eltin Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 8(1), 67–74.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.

Huda, T. (2016). Reflection of rhetorical pattern in the Introduction of academic research reports. Proceeding of International Conference on Teacher Training and Education, 1(1).

Lu, X., Yoon, J., Kisselev, O., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Deng, J., & Nie, R. (2021). Rhetorical and phraseological features of research article introductions: Variation among five social science disciplines. System, 100, 102543.

Nabilla, S., Kurniawan, E., & Gunawan, W. (2021). Rhetorical move structure of soft and hard science research article introductions by novice Indonesian authors. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 49(2), 135–151.

Rahayu, T., Permatasari, I., Mudofir, I., Sutantohadi, A., & Maftuh, M. F. (2022). Rhetorical Moves in The Background Sections of EFL Indonesian Vocational College Students. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 660–670.

Soraya, I., Riswan, A. H., Sholehuddin, T. R., & Mahendra, A. (2020). The Rhetorical Development of Students’ Research Paper Background. International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2019), 274–277.

Swales,John M. & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (3rd Editio). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3998/mpub.2173936

Downloads

Published

2023-11-09