MAXIM ANALYSIS OF TEACHER LUKE PODCAST ON YOUTUBE

Authors

  • Nisfia Laili Nizar Nahdlatul Ulama Islamic University Jepara
  • Aliva Rosdiana Nahdlatul Ulama Islamic University Jepara

Abstract

Communication must be delivered smoothly and clearly in order to be understood. Communication that follows the principle of good quality conversation. Speakers communicate effectively by providing accurate and concise information. This study employed Grice's cooperative principle. This study sought to identify: 1) types of conversation maxims, 2) categories of conversation maxims, and 3) the purpose of conversation maxims as seen in the Luke Podcast's first episode on YouTube. The researchers employed qualitative research methods. The goal of this research was to use document analysis to identify the maxims issue in Luke Podcast one episode from the YouTube script. According to research, there are four types of conversational maxims: quantity, quality, relation, and manner.

References

Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic Stylistics (Edinburgh textbooks in applied linguistics). Edinburgh University Press.

Carpenter, W. H. (1887). The study of language. In Science (Vol. 9, Issue 227 S). Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-9.227s.572

Clark, H. H. (2017). Inferences in comprehension. Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension, 243–264. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315467610_15

Grice, H. P. (1978). (n.d.). Further notes on logic and conversation. In Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, (pp. 113-1(In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Pragmatics (Syntax and Semantics 9)).

Grice, P. (1991. (n.d.). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.

Hirst, D. (1989). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. In Mind & Language (Vol. 4, Issues 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00246.x

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 25.

Karim, S. A. (2017). Analysis On Cooperative Principle And Politeness Principle In Guest Complaining At X Hotel In Kuta-Bali. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 2(2), 394. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.2.2.68.394-408

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. In Cambridge university press.

Merya Agusmita, C., & Marlina, L. (2018). E-Journal of English Language & Literature An Analysis of Conversational Maxim Violation Found in “The Monster House” Movie Script. E-Journal of English Language and Literature, 7(1).

Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 248–277.

Nofrion, K. P. (2016). Penerapan dalam Konsep Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ratna, Nyoman, K. (2004). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Recanati, F. (2000). ‘Pragmatics’. In Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Suciati, dkk. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Weber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual Effects in the Interpretations of Probability Words: Perceived Base Rate and Severity of Events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.781

Downloads

Published

2024-05-03